Font size:

Top Five 2003: Richard Sauvé v Canada (Chief Electoral Officer)

Each year at OJEN’s Toronto Summer Law Institute, a judge from the Court of Appeal for Ontario identifies five cases that are of significance in the educational setting. This summary, based on these comments and observations, is appropriate for discussion and debate in the classroom setting.

Sauvé v Canada (Chief Electoral Officer), [2002] 3 SCR 519, 2002 SCC 68

Should prisoners be allowed to vote? The law in question denied those serving sentences of two years or more in a correctional institution the right to vote, infringing the democratic rights of citizens under s.3 of the Charter.  The Supreme Court of Canada struck down the law, writing that, “the right to vote, which lies at the heart of Canadian democracy, can only be trammeled for good reason.  Here, the reasons offered do not suffice” [para. 1]. The full decision is available here.

Resource type

Grade level

Subject area


2 thoughts on “Top Five 2003: Richard Sauvé v Canada (Chief Electoral Officer)”

  1. Sauve v Canada (Chief Electoral Officer, [2002] 3 SCR 519, 2002 SCC 68

    Link not working on your website.


  2. Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Keep up-to-date with news from OJEN!

OJEN has cleaned its email list in accordance with CASL legislation. If you used to receive our publications, please enter your email address into the box below to check if you are still subscribed.

Your address was not found on our list.

You are already subscribed to OJEN’s newsletter, thank you.