Font size:

Landmark Case: Aboriginal Treaty Rights – R. v. Marshall

Each OJEN Landmark Case includes a case summary, classroom discussion questions and worksheets that encourage students to explore both the legal and societal importance of the case.

In 1993, Donald Marhsall, Jr., a Mi’kmaq Indian, was arrested and charged with selling eels without a license, fishing without a license and fishing during closed season with illegal nets. Mr. Marshall admitted that he caught and sold 463 pounds of eel without a licence and with a prohibited net within closed times. However, Mr. Marshall argued that he should not be found guilty of the charges that were against him because, as a Mi’kmaq Indian, he possessed the treaty right to catch and sell fish pursuant to treaties that had been signed between the British and the Mi’kmaq in 1760-61.

The majority of the Supreme Court of Canada (SCC) found that since Mr. Marshall was selling eel in limited quantities to support himself and his family, and not operating a large-scale commercial business, the scope of his activities fell within the treaty right. The SCC acquitted Mr. Marshall on all charges. The full decision is available here.

Resource type

Grade level

Subject area

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Keep up-to-date with news from OJEN!

OJEN has cleaned its email list in accordance with CASL legislation. If you used to receive our publications, please enter your email address into the box below to check if you are still subscribed.

Your address was not found on our list.

You are already subscribed to OJEN’s newsletter, thank you.